Natasha STRBIAK - Northwest Pacific Regional Championships 2012

Northwest Pacific Regional Championships 2012

Juvenile girls 3 - Free skating

2. Natasha STRBIAK WACAS

ElementsElements JUMPS W Waltz jump T Toe-loop S Salchow Lo Loop (or Rittberger) F Flip Lz Lutz A Axel The leading number denotes the number of rotations: 0=invalid, 1=single, 2=double, 3=triple, 4=quadruple. < Under-rotated << Downgraded ^e Jump takes off from wrong edge SEQUENCES CiSt Circular step sequence SeSt Serpent step sequence SlSt Straight line step sequence ChSt Choreographic step sequence ChSp Choreographic spiral The trailing character denotes the level of the sequence: 0=invalid, 1=lowest, ..., 4=highest. SPINS CSp Camel spin FCSp Camel spin with flying entry CCSp Camel spin with change of foot FCCSp Camel spin with change of foot and flying entry LSp Laid back spin FLSp Laid back spin with flying entry CLSp Laid back spin with change of foot FCLSp Laid back spin with change of foot and flying entry SSp Sit spin FSSp Sit spin with flying entry CSSp Sit spin with change of foot FCSSp Sit spin with change of foot and flying entry USp Upright spin FUSp Upright spin with flying entry CUSp Upright spin with change of foot FCUSp Upright spin with change of foot and flying entry CoSp Combination spin FCoSp Combination spin with flying entry CCoSp Combination spin with change of foot FCCoSp Combination spin with change of foot and flying entry The trailing character denotes the level of the spin: 0=invalid, 1=lowest, ..., 4=highest. INVALID An element marked with an asterisk (*) is invalid and gives zero points. The element is either incorrectly executed, or the skater has too many elements of that sort in the program.	Base valueBase values of elements JUMP Single Double Triple Quadruple W 0.3 - - - T 0.4 1.3 4.0 9.8 S 0.4 1.3 4.5 10.3 Lo 0.5 1.5 5.0 10.8 F 0.5 1.6 5.5 11.3 Lz 0.6 1.9 6.0 11.8 A 0.8 3.5 8.2 13.3 SEQUENCE Lev. 1 Lev. 2 Lev. 3 Lev. 4 SlSt 1.8 2.3 3.3 3.9 CiSt 1.8 2.3 3.3 3.9 SeSt 1.8 2.3 3.3 3.9 ChSt 2.0 - - - ChSp 2.0 - - - SPIN Lev. 1 Lev. 2 Lev. 3 Lev. 4 USp 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.4 SSp 1.3 1.6 2.1 2.5 CSp 1.4 1.8 2.3 2.6 LSp 1.5 1.9 2.4 2.7 FUSp 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.9 FSSp 2.0 2.3 2.6 3.0 FCSp 1.9 2.3 2.8 3.2 FLSp 2.0 2.4 2.9 3.2 CUSp 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.9 CSSp 1.9 2.3 2.6 3.0 CCSp 1.9 2.3 2.8 3.2 CLSp 2.0 2.4 2.9 3.2 CoSp 1.7 2.0 2.5 3.0 CCoSp 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5	GOEGrade of execution The judges can give plus points if they think an element was well executed or minus points if they think the element was badly executed. The judges use the scale {-3,-2,-1,0,+1,+2,+3} for this, as shown in the columns J1, J2, ... The mean value of the judges scores is transformed to a score correction via a table lookup. This correction is called "grade of execution" (GOE).	J1Panel of officials Referee : Lisa ERLE Controller : Linda LEAVER Specialist : Charles TICKNER Assistant : Amy EVIDENTE Judge No 1 : Michael BAUER Judge No 2 : Linda CHIHARA Judge No 3 : Jennifer HARTLEY Judge No 4 : Charlene TAGAS Judge No 5 : Lisa TALBOT Judge No 6 : Mary Ann WILCOX	J2Panel of officials Referee : Lisa ERLE Controller : Linda LEAVER Specialist : Charles TICKNER Assistant : Amy EVIDENTE Judge No 1 : Michael BAUER Judge No 2 : Linda CHIHARA Judge No 3 : Jennifer HARTLEY Judge No 4 : Charlene TAGAS Judge No 5 : Lisa TALBOT Judge No 6 : Mary Ann WILCOX	J3Panel of officials Referee : Lisa ERLE Controller : Linda LEAVER Specialist : Charles TICKNER Assistant : Amy EVIDENTE Judge No 1 : Michael BAUER Judge No 2 : Linda CHIHARA Judge No 3 : Jennifer HARTLEY Judge No 4 : Charlene TAGAS Judge No 5 : Lisa TALBOT Judge No 6 : Mary Ann WILCOX	J4Panel of officials Referee : Lisa ERLE Controller : Linda LEAVER Specialist : Charles TICKNER Assistant : Amy EVIDENTE Judge No 1 : Michael BAUER Judge No 2 : Linda CHIHARA Judge No 3 : Jennifer HARTLEY Judge No 4 : Charlene TAGAS Judge No 5 : Lisa TALBOT Judge No 6 : Mary Ann WILCOX	J5Panel of officials Referee : Lisa ERLE Controller : Linda LEAVER Specialist : Charles TICKNER Assistant : Amy EVIDENTE Judge No 1 : Michael BAUER Judge No 2 : Linda CHIHARA Judge No 3 : Jennifer HARTLEY Judge No 4 : Charlene TAGAS Judge No 5 : Lisa TALBOT Judge No 6 : Mary Ann WILCOX	J6Panel of officials Referee : Lisa ERLE Controller : Linda LEAVER Specialist : Charles TICKNER Assistant : Amy EVIDENTE Judge No 1 : Michael BAUER Judge No 2 : Linda CHIHARA Judge No 3 : Jennifer HARTLEY Judge No 4 : Charlene TAGAS Judge No 5 : Lisa TALBOT Judge No 6 : Mary Ann WILCOX	ScoreElement scores The element score is the sum of the base value and the correction (GOE). The scores given here are unofficial and can contain errors. Please check against the official results.
2F	1.80	0.30	1	0	1	1	1	1	2.10
CCoSp3	3.00	0.75	2	2	2	1	1	1	3.75
2Lz	2.10	0.30	1	1	1	0	1	1	2.40
LSp2	1.90	0.75	2	2	1	2	1	1	2.65
1A	1.21	0.00	0	0	1	0	0	0	1.21
2Lz+2Lo<	3.74	-0.30	-1	-1	-1	0	-1	-1	3.44
2F+2Lo<	3.41	-0.45	-1	-2	-1	-1	-3	-2	2.96
ChSt1	2.00	0.70	1	0	1	1	1	1	2.70
Total	19.16	2.05							21.21
Program componentsProgram components SKATING SKILLS o Balance, rhythmic knee action and precision of foot placement o Flow and effortless glide o Cleanness and sureness of deep edges, steps and turns o Power/energy and acceleration o Mastery of multi directional skating o Mastery of one foot skating TRANSITION/LINKING FOOTWORK o Variety o Difficulty o Intricacy o Quality PERFORMANCE/EXECUTION o Physical, emotional and intellectual involvement o Carriage o Style and individuality/personality o Clarity of movement o Variety and contrast o Projection CHOREOGRAPHY/COMPOSITION o Purpose (idea, concept, vision, mood) o Proportion (equal weight of parts) o Unity (purposeful threading of all movements) o Utilization of personal and public space o Pattern and ice coverage o Phrasing and form (movements and parts structured to match the phrasing of the music) o Originality of purpose, movement and design INTERPRETATION o Effortless movement in time to the music (timing) o Expression of the music′s style, character and rhythm o Use of finesse to reflect the nuances of the music		FactorProgram component weights The judges scores given under J1, J2, ... are multiplied by a value from this column when the total program component score is calculated.	J1Panel of officials Referee : Lisa ERLE Controller : Linda LEAVER Specialist : Charles TICKNER Assistant : Amy EVIDENTE Judge No 1 : Michael BAUER Judge No 2 : Linda CHIHARA Judge No 3 : Jennifer HARTLEY Judge No 4 : Charlene TAGAS Judge No 5 : Lisa TALBOT Judge No 6 : Mary Ann WILCOX	J2Panel of officials Referee : Lisa ERLE Controller : Linda LEAVER Specialist : Charles TICKNER Assistant : Amy EVIDENTE Judge No 1 : Michael BAUER Judge No 2 : Linda CHIHARA Judge No 3 : Jennifer HARTLEY Judge No 4 : Charlene TAGAS Judge No 5 : Lisa TALBOT Judge No 6 : Mary Ann WILCOX	J3Panel of officials Referee : Lisa ERLE Controller : Linda LEAVER Specialist : Charles TICKNER Assistant : Amy EVIDENTE Judge No 1 : Michael BAUER Judge No 2 : Linda CHIHARA Judge No 3 : Jennifer HARTLEY Judge No 4 : Charlene TAGAS Judge No 5 : Lisa TALBOT Judge No 6 : Mary Ann WILCOX	J4Panel of officials Referee : Lisa ERLE Controller : Linda LEAVER Specialist : Charles TICKNER Assistant : Amy EVIDENTE Judge No 1 : Michael BAUER Judge No 2 : Linda CHIHARA Judge No 3 : Jennifer HARTLEY Judge No 4 : Charlene TAGAS Judge No 5 : Lisa TALBOT Judge No 6 : Mary Ann WILCOX	J5Panel of officials Referee : Lisa ERLE Controller : Linda LEAVER Specialist : Charles TICKNER Assistant : Amy EVIDENTE Judge No 1 : Michael BAUER Judge No 2 : Linda CHIHARA Judge No 3 : Jennifer HARTLEY Judge No 4 : Charlene TAGAS Judge No 5 : Lisa TALBOT Judge No 6 : Mary Ann WILCOX	J6Panel of officials Referee : Lisa ERLE Controller : Linda LEAVER Specialist : Charles TICKNER Assistant : Amy EVIDENTE Judge No 1 : Michael BAUER Judge No 2 : Linda CHIHARA Judge No 3 : Jennifer HARTLEY Judge No 4 : Charlene TAGAS Judge No 5 : Lisa TALBOT Judge No 6 : Mary Ann WILCOX	ScoreProgram component score The score for a given program component equals the mean value of the judges scores. If more than three judges are present, the lowest and highest score are removed before the mean value is calculated. To get the total score, each mean value is multiplied by a factor from the column "Factor" and added. The scores given here are unofficial and can contain errors. Please check against the official results.
Skating Skills		1.25	3.75	4.00	3.25	3.50	4.25	4.00	3.81
Transitions		1.25	5.00	4.25	3.50	2.75	4.00	3.75	3.88
Performance/Execution		1.25	4.25	4.25	3.50	3.25	4.25	4.00	4.00
Choreography		1.25	4.75	4.50	3.00	3.25	4.00	4.00	3.94
Interpretation		1.25	3.75	4.25	3.00	2.75	3.75	4.00	3.63
Total									24.08
DeductionDeductions Skaters can get the following point deductions -1.0 for each 5.second the program is too short or too long (time violation) -1.0 if the music contains vocal -1.0 for each fall (a fall is defined as a loss of control by a skater with the result that the majority of his/ her own body weight is on the ice supported by any other part of the body than the blades e.g. hand(s), knee(s), back, buttock(s) or any part of the arm) -2.0 for illegal elements -1.0 for illegal costume									0.00
Program total		21.21 + 24.08 - 0.00 = 45.29